By using these forums you are agreeing to follow our Forum Rules. The NoFollow tag is enabled. Trolling will not be tolerated.

Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics |

No Calorie Sweetener with sucralose?
diatman
#1 Posted : Thursday, February 11, 2010 5:54:47 AM
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered

Joined: 1/2/2010
Posts: 17
Points: 54
I bought some of this sugar subsitute and am a little leary on trying it in every day baking. Has anyone used it and how did you like it? Also is there any medical draw back when it comes to using these products?
Thanks
Sponsor  
 
matthew
#2 Posted : Thursday, February 11, 2010 8:54:32 AM
Rank: Administration

Groups: Admin, Administrators, ModeratorCalorie, Registered

Joined: 11/6/2009
Posts: 129
Points: 395
I was a HUGE Splenda fan when it first came out, which is sucralose. I bought the stuff by box and all my diet drinks were made with Splenda. At the time my family and I thought we finally found a great alternative to sugar.

But it has a dark side that is not widely talked about. Chlorine is used in the process of making it, which inpart has lots of harmful side effects and long term problems which are just now coming to the surface. At the time I didn’t know.

The problem is that it has not been around long enough to really see the long term effects of it on your body. Just Google "Sucralose Dangers" and you will see thousands of pages talking about it.

This could have been a contributing factor in my getting Cancer.

So my advice, stay away from it. For now I use something called Stevia, which seems to be a decent sugar alternative.

Here are just a few links I found:

http://www.thepowerhour.com/news2/dangers_splenda.htm

http://www.redicecreations.com/specialreports/sucralose.html
countdown2010
#3 Posted : Monday, March 15, 2010 10:24:32 PM
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered

Joined: 3/15/2010
Posts: 25
Points: 81
I've been using stevia, but I'm quitting. I thought it was the best there is. I don't think it has sucralose, instead maltodextrin. But some critics say it may have some cancer causing additives.
http://www.mothernature.com/shop/detail.cfm/sku/49116

So far, I would say, use Raw Organic Honey.

Also try, agave nectar which is low glycemic, and has no sucralose, its totally natural from an agave fruit.

But the raw honey is so much sweeter, and better than plain sugar. The agave, for me, is not sweet enough. Others would completely disagree, so you might prefer it if you try.
countdown2010
#4 Posted : Monday, March 15, 2010 10:27:02 PM
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered

Joined: 3/15/2010
Posts: 25
Points: 81
Oops, I overlooked the no calorie part! sorry!
countdown2010
#5 Posted : Thursday, April 15, 2010 11:55:01 PM
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered

Joined: 3/15/2010
Posts: 25
Points: 81
I found stevia in the raw and truvia brands don't have maltodextrin.
So those are the best looking ones.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You can vote in polls in this forum.


This page was generated in 0.745 seconds.
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the MatthewsCalorieCounter.com Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material appearing on
MatthewsCalorieCounter.com is for entertainment use only and should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
The opinions expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the participants, and do not reflect the opinions of Matthews Calorie Counter or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates.

© 2008-2011 MatthewsCalorieCounter.com, Matthews Calorie Counter™, First Century Thinking LLC, All Rights Reserved.